My argument is that, if the market believed that a threat of a compulsory acquisition didn't hang over CIM, then the price could get to $65. But above 90% ownership, they can conduct a compulsory buy out. It is not an offer to sell; it is a forced sale.
So, does one sell before the 90% threshhold, hold and hope that they do nothing except continue to do a good job of management (and perhaps buy more), or take the chance that they pay a fair price. It would be an uninformed decision with good odds of being wrong. Pass the sleeping pills.
Yes, CIM might be an extreme case, but given the size of the Company, it's a fairly important one. But there is the potential for something similar to arise whenever there is a partial takeover.
And, having raised the topic, you didn't offer an opinion on the acceptability of the Creep Provisions. I realise that they're a reality but I think they stink.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TRS
- TRS price after today
TRS price after today, page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TRS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$3.16 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $117.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.17 | $3.18 | $3.16 | $49.15K | 15.54K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 1249 | $3.16 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.20 | 895 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 1249 | 3.160 |
5 | 3331 | 3.150 |
2 | 20312 | 3.140 |
1 | 958 | 3.130 |
3 | 13903 | 3.120 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.200 | 895 | 1 |
3.220 | 159 | 1 |
3.230 | 1640 | 1 |
3.240 | 200 | 1 |
3.250 | 641 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.56pm 10/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
TRS (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham, MD & CEO
James Graham
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online