The initial action of offence was a young man smashing and egg on fraser annings head. the law will look at the situation not as an instigating action but as an action by an individual causing distress which lead to a response, The age and sex of the individual alleged to the action should have no effect upon actual resultant verdict for an action of such nature.
Any political head speaking about policy has the right to do so without any physical body of person coming into contact in any form or manner and as in this case an object that may have or could of caused as such an incident of bizarre circumstance. What if as for instance if someone fell over after the egg was broken in the commotion and hit their head and was seriously or fatally harmed, then the initial action could be considered cause of the incident an therefore irresponsible. As strange as it sounds the right of free physical space is there to protect for such circumstance all individuals rights under the acts of freedom of speech.. The young boys actions led to an outcome. He made the first action therefore he is liable under the guise of the law. It is up to the magistrate or a judge in this case to decide as to the severity of the event and appropriate punishment..
