I have already said the kid committed assault, (as did Anning, and the others).
Anning would have gotten away with the first hit as a reaction to being assaulted with the egg, but not the second one where Anning had time to think and approach the kid to deliver the second hit.
".....The young boys actions led to an outcome. He made the first action therefore he is liable under the guise of the law....."
Incorrect, the kid would be liable for his own actions, as Anning would be for his own actions.
The law does not give Anning, or anyone else the right to retaliate, regardless of what actions preceded the retaliation.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Egg Boy Assaulted
Egg Boy Assaulted, page-33
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 52 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
AVH
Avita boosts skin restoration product portfolio with 'dermal matrix' – a kind of next-level gauze made of fake skin
GML
Gateway Mining sells WA Eastern Montague gold project to Brightstar for $14M – half of that in shares
Featured News
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales