Ann: CAT Signs Deal with NRL, page-12

How on earth can this document be allowed as an "ASX" release? It clearly has little substance and is a blatant attempt to use disingenuous information to effect the share price. As Reg asked, did Catapult not already claim to have all the NRL teams anyway? We then see an article by David Riccio in the Telegraph which clearly shows that the Broncos (arguably the biggest NRL franchise) actually use Statsports!! very embarrassing!!!

So its clear that NRL teams can use whatever supplier they wish.

This document is very smartly worded to make us believe that the company have signed a league wide deal when in fact the company have not. The NRL never mention Catapult by name in the quote nor do they say its a league wide deal or exclusive for that matter, They say "this is a milestone agreement for the NRL" NO mention of catapult as the exclusive beneficiary of "the agreement"
To go back to Reg's original question, i would say despite the rather disingenuous document catapult have LESS NRL teams than they had this time last year.
But because of the lack of detail in the reported accounts nobody knows if they are making more or less revenue from these teams

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/nrl-player-stats-deal-to-deliver-unprecedented-detail-for-fans/news-story/5b1f7bc14eab5ccc93e3e6db1b245838

Before i get accused of lots of things, it would suit a lot better if people on the forum were more balanced and less partisan.