Banter and General Comments, page-5368

I agree. I've mentioned before that having multiple projects across multiple continents is a recipe for disaster. I'd much rather have 1 good/great project pumping out good/great results than 3 projects nowhere near each other struggling in their own respective ways.

People can argue that multiple projects spreads the risk and whatnot, but I would argue that there's more things that can go wrong and you see all the time companies taking on more than they are capable of and ending up worse off than if they scaled things down so that they can excel doing less things than being not good at a lot of things. "Jack of all trades, master of none" certainly springs to mind with GXY.