The main one seems to be that if you wanted to nominate a director for consideration, you have to do it 30-35 business days before the meeting.
If more than 25% of people vote against the remuneration package, I think its a show of hands to either re-elect the Board or have a 'Spill Meeting'. 50% of the attendees then have to vote for the Spill Meeting. Then 90 days later the Spill Meeting will occur, and you'd need to nominate a director 30-35 business days before for them to be eligible. That's why they are tightening up this section of the Constitution now.
'Pro-Lou' vs 'Go-Lou', who will win*!
(*answer: those with more people at the AGM)
Ann: AGM Notice of Meeting - Annexure (Constitution), page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
19.5¢ |
Change
-0.010(4.88%) |
Mkt cap ! $366.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.5¢ | 20.5¢ | 19.5¢ | $481.0K | 2.399M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | 929264 | 19.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0¢ | 530139 | 28 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.24am 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRN (ASX) Chart |