What proof do you have that no one else was interested in buying the equipment? Where are you getting this from?
I don't think it's a secret that the equipment hasn't been fully installed. They have already spent the time to redesign and plan for the new layout. That is why Siemens are on board.
And your second post about not breaking even below 3-4GW is laughable. What evidence do you have to support this statement?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- Ann: US$52M Term Sheet Signed for New York Battery Plant
Ann: US$52M Term Sheet Signed for New York Battery Plant, page-171
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 327 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online