credibility, page-56

relevant posters

play the ball not the man, even if the man was playing the other man,
gee does that make any sense.

teefers integrity got questioned and he answered accordingly, how he reacts to certain posts is his prerogative not yours and should be left to him to do so if he wishes, this tag team responses going around is what causes half the problems on cvi thread and create a segregation of analytical questions which have and don't have Merritt some times.
as i see it he questioned t4p chart but wrongly through in a few insinuations.
i too have questioned his chart in my own mind, to be clear not the man but his chart, but t4ps response made a lot of sense and cleared a few things up for me and others out there, so something positive has come out of it and that's how it should be looked at.

i understand your response especially with all the shenanigans going on in cvi but a little more understanding of someones ability and communication skills would make life easier for all of us on cvi , not just in this discussion but all discussions.

t4p can be a little sensitive at times whether he admits it or not, but its not without Merritt i feel like he has taken on the teacher roll for a lot of pre schools, it must be testing at times.

just trying to be pro-active here