the total return of one class asset over another is a valid point
but what clearly fails to sink in the property permabull heads is just because one class of asset happens to perform better in one particular area than another class of asset IT DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MEAN IT IS A BETTER OR INVESTMENT.
Your denial does not change the fact that the particular class of investment does perform better in the area.
just as posting all the irrelevant garbage you can and twisting definitions any way you can is going to change the facts relating to the performance of one class of asset over another class.
FACT
the share market on average will produce better returns over time (10plus years) than the property market
As a rule property investment carries less risk than the share market
FACT
the share market is more liquid than the property market
FACT
The property market due to having less risk can be easier to leverage against and can at times give better tax advatages and cash flow than the share market.
