Classic mate. Why not go crack a Bundy you have it all figured out. Why is a fair go, such a 'ridiculous' claim? If you bothered to read my posts on the subject thoroughly you would understand the point I was attempting to make. 'This has nothing to do with non BP clients not getting alloacted stock'. Sorry to disappoint you, but thats exactly what it was about.
So let me spell it out for you. Sponsoring broker MAJORITY percentage allotted to in-house clients/ MINORITY percentage general public. You would still have your so called 'Tight Ship' so no big deal for the company raising the money. If they wanted a tight ship perhaps they could have tried private equity.
'Something for nothing', well rofl most here would know where assumptions get you. I am not sour grapes and sure I would be dissapointed if there were some allocated outside of BP which I missed. Point being; there were no shares allocated outside of BP.
So to answer your question and my only reason for reposting. Yes I am for real. Hope that helps, lol.
