Ann: Resignation of non-executive director, page-57

Of course this gives rise to other questions...

If WP was really only thinking one group of "Folks" (providing capital...ie the US folks ) at the time of the AGM...was that a realistic portrayal to shareholders that they alone could provide all the "when we need capital"? "needed"??

Or was he still thinking 2 groups of Folks (all along) would both provide that capital (at the time of the AGM) and there has been some sort of fall out or sudden change of plan in the couple weeks between the AGM and this resignation?

No doubt we will be more the wiser when Redants question to the company is answered...?

(IMO)