Dull,
I don't understand why categorising these types of transactions as professional or not is important.
Any system that allows players to profit while breaking the rules is open to gaming - one just needs to do a cost/benefit analysis. Environmental law is rife with examples where it is cheaper to pay fines that clean up a mess.
IMO, and I'm confident you'd agree, T+3 should mean T+3. Clearly, that is expectation of most small investors and indeed most market players. I imagine that most people would be surprised that you are not forced to close a short position on T+3.
As the article states, the ASX could fairly easily amend the regulations.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BNB
- no stock lending
BNB
babcock & brown limited
no stock lending, page-14
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries
CC9
Chariot Corporation (ASX:CC9) refines Black Mountain strategy, launching Pilot Mine to seize U.S. lithium opportunity