it does not work commercially, page-45

Mango,

if you read the historic Annual Reports you may notice Ivanhoe back at the time of listing.

Come from a legal family with two in laws patent attorneys. Am comfortable with the patentability of subsequent research to generate patents of addition. Point was along the lines of how long the whole process has taken without much to show for it in my opinion.

Kelvin Club preso was singular. If I typed in the plural was an error.

If you do indeed read the Annual Reports, start with North Parkes and the three Mongolian Projects. That is the start of the list post 'listing'!

Talking to engineers? I work in an office full of them. Any one of the dropkicks can upscale off a design. The trick is to make the blessed thing work out in the real world as opposed to a glorified chemistry set/demo plant. On new technology that requires deep pockets-pockets that lie outside of INL's balance sheet. Potential backers with no recourse-have not seen them lining up. Certainly have not demonstrated the faith by buying shares in INL now have they!

And how many ounces did INL produce last quarter as opposed to merely making claims how robust their technology is?

But I guess I only spout rubbish. Well it is a chat site afterall, and unlike some feel comfortable about chatting on more than one stock? At least I do not have a vested interest to protect.

Think I will continue to dodge this one for a while and revisit later in the Year. Merry Christmas!

Cheers,TAS