LTR 0.00% 83.5¢ liontown resources limited

Kathleen Valley Project Discussion, page-35

  1. 1,722 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 408
    @anatol

    The true is, that no one knows if PLS production slow down is 100% associated with production issues.

    Please check other produces like A40 , AJM or GXY. All are not shipping what they planned year ago. On the other hand, MIN is doing well so are partners in Greenbushes and are planning nice increase in production.
    It shows that any other mine which is not 100% owned by an Aussie company have no issues.

    IMO, there is artificial pressure by Chinese to force cheap price on Australian producer/s which does no much room to move due to high costs of borrowings for mine development and interest payment associated with it.


    I found it funny how often new explorer with initial drilling success is quoted as going to be "another PLS" and now is criticised for low grade which was no secret since 2015/6.

    LTR is performing like PLS during exploration times but there is no guarantee that will not face the same or similar problems (like others have now) in the near future.

    All talk about big boys coming and buying one of deposits is only speculation of HC forum posters and/or getting off take agreement now could be as much problematic as is for other current 100% owned Aussie miners.

    The way thing are going it could be more beneficial and cheaper for "big boys" to T/O existing produces with all hard work done than buying explorer like LTR.

    WES move on KDR had IMO more to do with upstream production (where real profit is) than just buying their exploration success.

    Looking into the future, let's enjoy this explorer run as current lithium history proved there is no joy for shareholders who are holding into production.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.