Ann: Half Year Accounts, page-349

As is usual - when one of the positive posters gets onto a point that they imagine has me flummoxed they want to shout and scream about it all over the place. And to the extent of labelling someone a hypocrite.

well here’s the challenge for you @Pinnacle have a look back at my previous posts - many of my questions remain unanswered

So if you could - would you please list the questions in a coherent way and in a format where there is no ambiguous intent please.

Simply asking “can you provide your thoughts on the people and businesses brought under the CGB banner” is a very poor question. I mean no offence there but that is, I think, indicative of the fact that you will brook no criticism of your beloved CGB.

Seriously, I could simply answer your question as follows, I have no thoughts or comments to make about the businesses and people brought under the CGB banner. In my view, that’s not where the problem lies with CGB and that fact ought to be very clear to even the most casual reader. How does that work for you? Have you missed the point of my posts perhaps? What else do you need?

And if you could resist that little urge within you to name call that would be greatly appreciated. I know it gets the cheer squad excited but it is still churlish. Where in your life experiences have you successfully encouraged others to discuss things with you right after calling them names? Really??

Dan disagrees with me and that’s fine but does it without calling names.

Hypocrite - please!! There’s not a poster here that could possibly be missing my points re CGB.