SLX 3.87% $4.72 silex systems limited

more solar news, page-6

  1. 2,701 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 118

    hard to read but looks like some efficient solar cells






    Compound Semiconductor June 2008 compoundsemiconductor.net 21
    Te c h n o l o g y C o n f e r e n c e R e p o r t
    III-V solar states its performance case
    Looking out of the window on the train from Madrid to Seville, you might catch sight of a phalanx of
    solar panels in a key test plant for compound semiconductor-based energy production. With sites like
    this becoming increasingly common, the concentrating photovoltaic industry gathered in Madrid to
    report their systems’ latest results at the CPV Today summit, and Andy Extance joined them.
    If we were to look for a birthplace for the current
    resurgence of compound semiconductor solar technology,
    Madrid could make a strong claim. This
    year the Institute for Concentrator Photovoltaic Systems
    (ISFOC) has begun an authoritative study into
    the effectiveness of III-V-based systems. Although
    the tests are spread across Spain, this initiative was
    developed by the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    (UPM). Madrid also recently held the inaugural
    Concentrated Photovoltaics (CPV) Today summit.
    Antonio Luque, director of the Solar Energy Institute
    at UPM, underscored the importance of the
    meeting as he gave the first presentation, calling it
    “the starting gun in the race for CPV”.
    Despite clearly being taken aback by the buzzing
    350-strong audience, Luque and his colleague
    Gabriel Sala opened proceedings by welcoming the
    broad interest as crucial for the industry. The obvious
    presence of investment bankers and analysts in
    the throng prompted conference chair Sala to call for
    improved understanding of the difference between
    concentrating and conventional silicon photovoltaics
    among the financial community.
    The difference that Luque went on to detail predominantly
    revolves around the use of compound
    semiconductor cells at the heart of CPV solar arrays.
    These cells monolithically integrate GaInP and
    GaAs layers on top of a germanium substrate, with
    each layer absorbing a different portion of the spectrum.
    These triple-junction cells comfortably hold
    the record for conversion efficiency of solar energy,
    delivering 40% compared with silicon’s 27%.
    The bad news is that this benefit comes with the
    additional expense common to compound semiconductor/
    silicon comparisons. However, Luque made
    the point that whereas silicon is now approaching its
    theoretical efficiency limit, he believes that monolithic
    III-V cells could reach at least 50% efficiency.
    For this to happen, a number of potential design
    advances could be exploited, for example by using
    quantum dots as an extra junction in the cells.
    Until this happens, the refinement of current
    approaches still has much to offer. Geoff Kinsey,
    the technical lead in CPV products at US cell
    maker Spectrolab, explained what to expect from
    the company’s latest generation of triple-junction
    technology. Due to hit the market in the third quarter
    of 2008, the C2MJ line is aiming to push the
    efficiency record to 42%. This 2% efficiency boost
    should translate to the company’s day-to-day production
    averages, bringing these to more than 38%
    efficiency. By 2009 Spectrolab hopes to make as yet
    unspecified modifications of the materials used in
    their cells, to deliver a 43% hero-cell.
    Azur Space, the European III-V cell manufacturer,
    cut its teeth in powering satellites, like Spectrolab
    Concentrated Photovoltaics
    (CPV) Today 2008 was held at
    the Mirasierra Suites Hotel in
    Madrid, Spain, on April 1–2.
    The conference boasted more
    than 350 attendees, 24
    speakers and 6 exhibitors,
    after initially being planned for
    an audience of only 150. “We
    had to open up into a second
    room to take the full capacity,”
    said the organizers.
    Concentrix sola r GMBH
    compoundsemiconductor.net June 2008 22 Compound Semiconductor
    Te c h n o l o g y C o n f e r e n c e R e p o r t
    and Emcore. As such, the majority of its financing
    still comes from the space industry, with very little
    from CPV. In that sliver of CPV business, the company
    supplies system makers like Concentrix Solar
    and Sol3G with cells that attain 35% conversion
    efficiency at 500× concentration. However, according
    to the company’s director of business development,
    Gerhard Strobl, more interest is needed to
    push his company’s research for CPV further.
    Power networking
    Although there is room to improve cell efficiency,
    without an economic driver these possibilities
    would remain academic. A key point that CPV
    Today underlined is that, across the world, increased
    backing from the energy industry is providing this
    driver. So, with power companies forming a notable
    subset of attendees alongside the financiers, the
    leading system makers sought to show the promise
    of CPV in general and their products in particular.
    Ironically, for a conference held amid the hotbed
    of Spanish CPV, the most definitive data on system
    performance came from German and Australian
    companies. One of the first three participants
    in ISFOC, German company Concentrix Solar,
    installed the first 100 kW of its 300 kW project allocation
    in February. Given the early stage of that
    work, Concentrix instead showed results of a typical
    September day in 2007 at a 5.75 kW plant in Llorca,
    Spain. Clear data showed module efficiency of more
    than 20% from before 10 a.m. until after 6 p.m. with
    output power peaking at more than 5 kW at 2 p.m.
    According to CEO Hansjörg Lerchenmüller,
    the
    efficiency benefits that this offers over competing
    silicon systems, which can offer only 14% module
    efficiency, readily convert to cost savings.
    Lerchenmüller is undaunted that these early stage
    data come in at less than the 25% efficient modules
    that he says his company’s technology is capable of.
    According to him, that performance level will help
    Concentrix beat the euro-per-watt cost of silicon by
    2010. This will also be aided by the state-of-the-art
    production plant with annual module manufacturing
    capacity of 25 MW that the company is due to
    bring online in August.
    Concentrix boasts the backing of energy companies
    Abengoa Solar and Good Energy, as well as an
    order backlog that will keep it busy for the whole
    of 2008. Having also spun out of the highly reputed
    Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy, Concentrix
    presented its results analysis with the assurance of
    a company set to be a key force in CPV.
    Australian company Solar Systems could be considered
    one of the pioneers of the current wave of
    CPV technologies. It has existed since 1990 and has
    operated commercial systems for 10 years. It is also
    a convert from silicon to compound semiconductor
    cells and confirms a 46% efficiency difference
    between the two with its own data.
    Solar Systems’ existing systems are typically
    dish concentrators, in comparison to the planar
    heliostat arrays common elsewhere in the world.
    John Lasich, the company’s CTO, was able to present
    data on a 130 kW peak output dish power plant,
    where the best dishes delivered 23.7% efficiency. At
    another facility, two years of data showed a single
    33 kW receiver producing 196 kWh per day, under
    7 kWh/m2 of solar radiation on average. This corresponded
    to 21.2% system DC efficiency, which
    dropped to 19.6% when converted to the AC that is
    compatible with the electricity grid.
    Solar Systems can claim its own energy company
    backer in the shape of TruEnergy, a subsidiary of
    China Light and Power, as well as strong support
    from the Australian government. These partners
    will help the company convert to heliostats for
    deployment in a 154 MW power plant due for full
    commissioning in 2013. On this massive scale – and
    using Spectrolab cells – Solar Systems will once
    more be forging a path for modern-day CPV.
    For other system makers, proving manufacturing
    ability was of more importance than showing
    results. Amongst these was Concentración Solar la
    Mancha – now part of the Renovalia Energy group,
    which claims to be the major installer of photovoltaic
    parks in Spain. Its CEO, Miguel Trinidad, is
    an automobile industry veteran, who is seeking to
    exploit his manufacturing experience. The kind of
    discipline demanded by that industry, Trinidad reasons,
    is key to getting the costs of CPV down.
    Strategic concerns
    Emcore brought the biggest delegation from a single
    company, representing its broader focus compared
    with its rival Spectrolab. Instead of its GaAs-based
    cell development, the company used its presentation
    to promote its CPV systems. Earl Fuller, the
    vice-president leading this business unit, promoted
    his systems by citing Emcore’s prior experience
    as
    a provider of capital equipment in manufacturing
    compound semiconductor reactors. Fuller talked
    about system deals that include participating in
    ISFOC, and an 850 kW deployment in Spain, but
    could claim little in the way of installed capacity.
    This system focus unsettled some at the conference,
    who could otherwise be Emcore’s cell customers.
    They feared that Emcore could vertically
    integrate all of its cell production, tipping their
    preference in favor of Spectrolab’s record-holding,
    albeit costlier, cells. However, the presence of
    newer, alternative III-V cell manufacturers at CPV
    Today, like Solar Junction and Taiwan-
    based LED
    manufacturer Arima, might have reassured these
    worries. Furthermore, rumors suggested that the
    likes of Sharp and Samsung might soon further
    broaden CPV cell supply.
    Emcore’s system focus also meant that there was
    no mention of its major terrestrial III-V cell customer,
    Green and Gold Energy, which itself generated
    some comment. Internet speculation about the
    relationship between the companies wiped a third
    off Emcore’s stock price in a day, just two weeks
    Solar Systems demonstrated
    the effects of highly
    concentrated sunlight by using
    one of its concentrators to
    burn a hole in a piece of 6 mm
    thick copper.
    The first 100 kW of
    Concentrix’s ISFOC installation
    in Puertollano was completed
    in February.
    Concentrix sola r Gmbh Sola r syst ems
    Compound Semiconductor June 2008 compoundsemiconductor.net 23
    Te c h n o l o g y C o n f e r e n c e R e p o r t
    prior to CPV Today. Some attendees speculated that
    Emcore might be trying to disown Green and Gold,
    but David Danzilio, head of Emcore’s photovoltaics
    division, denied this. Instead he pointed out that for
    his colleague Fuller, Green and Gold is a competitor
    and hence should not be mentioned in talks focused
    on Emcore’s power-generating systems.
    The controversy surrounding Emcore and Green
    and Gold served as a focus for a concern expressed
    by many at the conference. They felt that the presence
    of investment analysts and bankers could be a
    mixed blessing. With some attendees citing experience
    in the telecoms industry, whispered anxieties
    of the solar industry being pumped up into an
    economic bubble by unscrupulous financial types
    underlay the otherwise positive tone.
    For Green and Gold’s part, CEO Greg Watson
    made a confident show of his company’s technology,
    developed using AUS$500,000 ($472,000) investments
    from Watson and private investors. Now,
    Green and Gold is close to making its SunCube
    systems commercially, further funded by $6 million
    earned licensing manufacturing rights outside
    the company’s native Australia. Watson claimed a
    “real world” peak efficiency of around 30% for his
    modules on the roof of the Green and Gold facility
    in March 2007. He also presented standard test
    data but questioned the usefulness of the recent
    IEC 62108 standard for safety and reliability of the
    CPV module. The lack of an accredited test for output
    power meant that no direct comparison could be
    made with silicon photovoltaics.
    This fact, Watson
    felt, bore the signs of undue influence from silicon
    industry participants in defining the standard.
    The final talk came from the mayor of the Spanish
    town of Puertollano, where two ISFOC installations
    are sited. During the conference, descriptions
    of Puertollano approached a kind of CPV El Dorado.
    Take the train from Madrid to Seville, Lerchenmüller
    said, look out of the window and there you’ll see our
    installation. Indeed as well as ISFOC, Puertollano
    will soon host a separate
    research center belonging
    to system maker SolFocus.
    Puertollano, which has christened itself the
    “International City of Energy”, is historically
    a
    coal-mining town. As well as retaining a strong
    petrochemical industry, it boasts the first monosilicon
    wafer plant in Spain. BP Solar is also investing
    7100 million ($155 million) here to build one of the
    largest
    solar module plants in Europe.
    The presence of these power incumbents so close
    to the ISFOC pilots is a good reminder of the reality
    of CPV technology, which is clearly beginning
    to happen and is starting to grow. Yet there is still
    much work to be done to find a place out of the
    shadow of CPV’s larger power-generating rivals. l
    We supply the state-of-the-art GaN epi
    wafers
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.