Ann: Chile Lithium Brine Presentation, page-59

thanks Micky. As a lithium amateur, I didn't find the presentation particularly compelling. The last thing investors want to listen to is "lithium supply & demand and technical info" from a penny dreadful director. Investors want to know about the pros and cons of the exploration prospects.

i noticed you on the GNL thread and I did some BMG research over the last 1 hour. if you don't mind, I have some questions for you:

1. Similar to GNL, the Salar West claims are not on the flat salar lake and are around 100 to 200 metres higher in altitude above the lake, on hilly terrain. What is the significance of this, if any?

2. The same appears to apply to Salar de Pajonales, where the BMG claims are around 100 metres higher than the SQM salar. What is the significance of this, if any?

3. Natalie is 2,000 metres higher in elevation and about 200km by road from SQM at Salar West although only 100km if they bulldoze a short cut. However, Google Earth shows larger salars near Natalie, which, like Natalie, surround Caichinque volcano: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caichinque. Some info here: https://www.lithiumchile.ca/project-item/salar-de-talar/ & https://www.lithiumchile.ca/projects/ & https://www.miningweekly.com/articl...alignment-with-lithium-aspirations-2018-01-04 . Do you know anything about these?

4. How is BMG's Salar West and Salar de Pajonales different & better than GNL's? Both appear to be higher in altitude, not on the salar and on the fringes? Thanks