The wording is strange, when the only thing that might be spectacular about the results is that they are spectacularly disappointing. ChinaSyndrome alluded to the issue of reserves not living up to the JORC, and the stuff just not being there. That’s why infill drilling, and diamond drilling to confirm RC Drilling, is done.
Here are two examples. The top one is what you would like the twin results to look like. Within cooee of each other. The second one is not. The diamond hole is only 4m from the RC, yet returns 18% less REO and 25% less NdPr. Rather than calling this “spectacular”, thoughts from the company about the discrepancy would be more useful, imo.
I’d hoped CS would comment, he seems to have a lot of experience.