Woodside Petroleum Limited, page-147

Kimbo,
I'm not sure which of my posts you are responding to, I assume it's the last post I made here! I have trouble making sense of your posts at the best of times.

So I presume that this is your hollow argument for why FAR's claim couldn't be speedily dealt with if it was an open and shut case in favour of COP. Well why hasn't it now been dismissed and why were the TOR delayed by COP? You should know this!

I guess that you have been too busy with your day job at COP which hasn't afforded you the opportunity to post for a few days. You can rest assured that COP are happy with your performance as you have done a great job running interference for them. Whilst I can't say that I have read every one of your posts (I doubt I would be able to survive that), every one of your posts that I have read has been subjective and in support of COP/WPL. Whilst I won't assert that I don't believe everything you say, I definitely believe your disclosure that you don't hold. You know that you would have no credibility if you said that you do hold because you are so biased against FAR in the posts I have read. I also note that you don't post on any other stocks but FAR which would only be a distraction from your appointed task. I had suspected that as you hadn't appeared since the ICC hearing was scheduled to end last Friday that you wouldn't be returning. I guess you will continue until the decision is handed down by the ICC.

Now lets hear your denials! Why would anybody spend eight months of his time posting on only one stock that he doesn't want, doesn't hold and apparently is only interested in that hated stock? It is also clear that you have deeply familiarised yourself with the details of this dispute and and with COP's affairs (these would probably be known to you) which as a non holder is quite remarkable. Quite an investment in time for no reward?

It must be out of the goodness of your heart to save us from ourselves.

ANZ