Mjp2, are you saying that you have verified the falsehood of all on the list? That would be onerous but let me know either way. You are right regards calibration of the device - it's easy to calibrate, but like police radars easy to muck up as well. Can you provide the link for that calibration please?
But you know you have not responded to anything else in my post; the theme of which was why do they have limits so close to the datapoints! I add a couple more: Why does Jennifer have to answer to the BOM or you own thoughts? Why are there missing/ blank data points for minimums in the dataset. I also asked a few more questions that you ignored. What about all these?
You seem to want to be the winner ("You catching on yet? You aren't backing a winner."). What about just working through all the apparent difficulties some of have. I not satisfied with many of your answers. Surely proponents know sometimes research doesn't quite get things right. You cannot even say you got the wrong government? And look at the part that says "I note a few of them at least t- hat I had a quick look at - were in that Abbott era you've defined." You're more politically hungary in your writing than you seem to know.
