Banter and General Comments, page-9032

First 9032 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Sjlasx

4,066 Posts.

3554

16/08/19

23:09

Post #: 40022666
Share

Originally posted by Thesi: ↑

I think you offer a really good perspective @Sjlasx and consider you someone worth listening too.

Your points on A40 I have considered also. Given that Galaxy is considered their number 1 suitor though anything could happen between now and September.

Mark Calderwood in a post @Haplo posted on their forum seemed to give glowing praise to Galaxy, and make the arrangement out to be like Galaxy was defending a fellow Aussie miner. But I think we need to take a step back and realise that as great as it might be seen that we look after a fellow aussie... Business is business and the company needs to bring the best value to the holders. (In Galaxy)

Another poster pointed out that Lepidico and Alita have been like uni students that haven't left home, but I am pretty sure that it was A40 that asked us for money more recently than that of Lepidico who I must say have been very good at doing their own capital raisings and bringing value to their holders... Including us.. Galaxy as we have ownership in them and have converted.

A40 if Galaxy was to take them over... How do we work it out?

They have been in a suspension just before the recent crash and as I said earlier would probably be around 5 or 6 cents had that not occurred.

Given Galaxy have cash, I don't think they would do a scrip for scrip with a cash consideration as they want to use their cash for developing other projects.

Galaxy could use cash from recent shipments though.

To bring A40 into the fold do we experience dilution or that of a value add that as it merges doesn't cause the share price to fall away?

Whilst A40 might work well for the company without producing lithium chemicals how special are we?

Expand

One way to consider the GXY shareholder benefit of acquiring A40 is whether A40 is more undervalued currently than GXY.
As much as I dislike the idea of a share buyback, as I believe the funds are required for development, I am now of the opinion that it would be better bang for buck than acquiring A40 and I don't mean the potential benefit of propping up the GXY SP in this environment, I'm thinking of the long term.
If you take that same train of thought into consideration of a script offer, I believe that any offer of higher value than 1 GXY for 20 A40 would be of net negative benefit to existing GXY holders.
I strongly believe that with GXYs Cash, SDV & JB assets the company is fundamentally highly undervalued in comparison to A40.
AIMHO

Last edited by Sjlasx: 16/08/19

GXY Price at posting: $1.13 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
8 Upvote

2 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

FBU

Fletcher Building 'exploring options' around construction division sale

ASX Market Close: How a megadam in Tibet pushed us into the red

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

CIA

'Share long-term visions': Champion Iron rallies on mooted Nippon, Sojitz partnership

RML

Resolution Minerals appoints industry experts to fast-track US growth strategy

First 9032 Last

Add to My Watchlist

What is My Watchlist?

A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Banter and General Comments, page-9032

Top Stories

Fletcher Building 'exploring options' around construction division sale

ASX Market Close: How a megadam in Tibet pushed us into the red

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

'Share long-term visions': Champion Iron rallies on mooted Nippon, Sojitz partnership

Resolution Minerals appoints industry experts to fast-track US growth strategy

Featured News