ARQ chart, page-62

@byyourside -- There is a difference between scrutiny (bringing up facts and being able to support them) and trash talk (ramping and downramping). He was definately doing the latter. He could provide links to others negatives, which is substantive or like he was saying:
"Melbourne I.T is a terrible company run by idiots... I know I've had customers who have used them. Suffice to say I move customers off them as quickly as practical." <-- Trash talk.
Even if one part of the business is toxic. The others may well still have good value in them. Considering the steep fall thus far and their restated guidance... if they can meet the guidance, then your good mate. I like companies which are already developed that have issues like this one. But, like reading others posts when they can bring up substantive details. GLTAH or look elsewhere.