IMO if they thought A40 could be made profitable why not take 51% stake - whilst sentiment is at it's worst.
The notion other people are painting that if A40 don't service the loan they can buy A40 for a song. but imo if A40 can't be profitable - then it's a waste of money owning it anyways. See MIN regarding Wodgina. Stating top of class but mothballing project. (saving face i suspect)
I think GXY's expertise in producing are much better than A40. Hopefully there's some synergy and collaboration moving forward, hence why i would have preferred them to take material control. As previous stated i think GXY will be one of the only ones that comes out the otherside - but IMO could have been a lot more strategic in the last 3 years and better positioning. Them having cash backing is one of the factors which i really like above them currently. (Cognisant this isn't a cash payment)
If they're looking long term bald hill doesn't have an overly long mine life.
IMO should have grabbed 51% of A40 (not a holder) if they think it's a winner in the next 2-3 years.
Or
if looking long term IMO they would have been better buying into a hard rock producer with better quality and longer mine life LTR (not a holder), AVZ (holder), MLL (not a holder).
Probably need to revisit this decision in 12-24months to understand if it was the right call or not.
*Disclosure bullish on lithium long term, held GXY years ago may look to make an entry when the overall market improves.
SF2TH
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GXY
- GXY emergency offer for Alita?
GXY emergency offer for Alita?, page-327
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GXY (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online