Banter and General Comments, page-94

@YourDudliness. no it doesn't suffice as it seems reasonable to be able to enter into a discussion about one important aspect of the stock by saying, for example, well, if NUH were unable to consistently supply their most important customer then yes I would be worried about that. However you are not willing to do even that because your posts indicate you are not willing to consider any potential negatives about NUH. That's fine of course, totally up to you. It just means I value your posts accordingly, I often find them interesting but they are not to be taken too seriously because of your rose coloured glasses.

As for your paranoia, repeatedly expressed, about why people post and your own conclusions about their motives. Well, to quote you, I see that as having "zero merit and zero backup", so by your own standards, surely your baseless conclusions as to why people post are not worth posting about? That is, you whack into people for posting without substantiating their opinions but you offer opinions about the, lets say, ulterior motives of why people might post negative things about NUH. It's absurd, you mock your own 'standards' by doing so.

For instance, maybe 'poster x' posts because they are a quadraplegic and social media and online forums are their hobbies. Maybe they have more time than most because of this, to spend on posting. Maybe they think NUH are not going to succeed and maybe they post the negatives accordingly. Maybe other posters have attacked them for doing so and therefore maybe they start getting annoyed and do some research and keep posting etc etc. Maybe that is the reason why 'poster x' posts. maybe it isn't. It's as well supported by the facts as your claims about how they are trying to trick holders into selling so that they can then buy up all the shares for a bargain basement price.

re the stock. i guess we wait on the results for the next leg up or down.