Ann: LCK Signs Heads of Agreement to Commence ISG in China, page-222

'Also feel the releases by LCK must be legit. If not, they'd be in all sorts of legal trouble.'

And that, Range61, is precisely the issue at stake.

LCK claimed a successful PCD, but to this point has evaded releasing the gas flow data. Meanwhile the SA Department for Energy and Mining made it clear - in writing, to a number of parties, also posted on these threads - that commercial flow rates were not achieved according to LCK's own criteria. Sure, there is a massive defined reserve, but the issue of getting it out of the ground has not been demonstrably solved.

Which part of this is hard to understand?

It was clear to at least 4 serious former holders, one of whom has chosen 'feisty mode' and thus cops vitriol here. But it's unfair to tell him to get advice from management when the initial issue was the evasiveness of management in the first place. It's not over yet.

Happy to be labelled a grub along with Legman, something of a badge of honour in present company.