how very convenient such photos turn up so long after the event - they were not available at the time of the attack to my memory. As far as I can remember Boeing never confirmed the few alleged parts that were found at the time were from their aircraft. I like that the author of this concocted piece was C Stewart Hardwick award winning Sci-fi author, LOL.
You also might want to tell your avid followers that a cruise missile is also powered by a turbo fan engine just like an aircraft which probably explains why when these pictures were shown to sceptical viewers that they seemed a bit small for a 737?.... and your statement about being able to clearly see the wheel and indercarriage parts? what?....
the only proof that ever matters in a court of law is contemporaneous proof. There was no contemporaneous proof of an aircraft hitting the Pentagon. How simple is that? and it wouldn't matter for instance what footage the FBI now showed about what hit the Pentagon (they absolutely know what did) because they could by now have distorted anything.
