Can you help a climate change "denier" with a few questions?
Would it have been better if CO2 in the atmosphere had reduced from 280ppm by 120ppm instead of going up by that amount in the past 150 years?
Is the level of CO2 in the atmosphere above or below the level at which plant life would optimally thrive?
Is thriving plant life a good or bad thing for the planet?
Why did the temperature increase between 1910 and 1940 just as much as between 1970 and 2000 and yet our emissions output only seriously ramped up in 1950?
Is this increase between 1910 and 1940 an example of emissions lag?
Did Al Gore get it right when he panicked the world and made a fortune by predicting the arctic ice was on track to be gone by 2013?
Is Al Gore much richer now as a consequence of his association with carbon trading?
Is there more or less arctic ice than in 1930?
Are there more or less polar bears?
How come the Great Lakes are thriving when we were told they were irreversibly drying out in 2012 and that was solid evidence of climate change?
The list is endless, and yet somehow the lunatics think that being reminded of their own constant stream of ridiculous panic is somehow proof of a weakness in those that don't believe. Clown world!
