did you not read what was actually said " scientists emphasize that many concerns and unanswered questions remain. One of the great unknowns in the story of water levels on the Great Lakes is how precipitation patterns will change in the years to come. Some models suggest that precipitation is actually expected to increase, which may help to offset declines caused by increased evaporation. “The general consensus right now, looking at a broad range of models that have been developed for the Great Lakes, is that there is a big range of variability, but there appears to be a decreasing trend in water levels over the next century,” said Gronewold."
So amidst that stated uncertainty and large variability, and only a stated appearance of a long term trend over the next century, you use a single data point just 5 years later to incorrectly claim that is evidence the scientists were wrong?
