Who's out to get ISX?, page-175

HC will probably say 'no'.

Best thing I have found to date on HC, is to add the most suspicious posters' names and those whose posts contain defamatory and/or 'maliciously aligned content' to your followed HC members' list.

In your own HC account settings start following the worst or the most suspicious of the HC posters. A new one came into the ISX forum today (a one-of post) and I have added them to my watchlist given their comments on ISX and another ASX listed company that AFR have mentioned in the past 2 weeks in relation to 'a sellers' report affecting a different ASX listed company.

HC have to record your followed members list (you can snapshot it also for your record as IDs/names appear to change - for me, sometimes the number of posts is a 'giveaway clue' and the different sites the poster is posting on plus their comments on each site).

Remember, ISP addresses rarely change and if they do, they are traceable. HC also have to always record and maintain the content of all moderated posts. HC have been requested by ASIC in the past to provide ISP addresses for HC posters.

Obviously there will be some posters who you won't want to follow....

A different but relevant topic:

Shapiro's motives are very dubious/motives unknown and could be the result of 'at best' lazy sourcing of material (how many co-authors does one need to create a single unverified biased article and from which sources e.g. twitter, other social media sites);

- or 'worse' vengeful journalism and/or the author/s seeking another annual "15 minutes of fame"; and/or

the worst case scenario which would be collusion with OM --- but we need 'other' evidence before we can claim collusion with OM or related parties has occurred.

***
On a related note: as example: why doesn't Shapiro (and his co-authors) investigate the Chinese companies, buying Australian companies using funds they have obtained by listing via IPOs on the ASX....plus those same Chinese companies being supported in 2019 by newly implemented Chinese Government's grants to buy overseas companies (source Chemlinked). Some of these newly listed ASX Chinese led IPOs (listed within the last 1-3 years)....do not report to the ASX quarterly and do not report to shareholders. At least 2 Chinese owned/managed ASX companies, do not have telephone numbers or contacts or email addresses for their corporate entities on their company website. One, does not even provide quarterly reports to the ASX or investors. Another, if you access their website, you are warned it is unsafe to 'access - or visit online' and is being monitored by 'unknown parties'. S66 is one such company.

Aren't they, S66 and other such companies, a more worthy target for JS's aspirations for another p----poor W------ award.