Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Dynamic population shift, page-35

First 35 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Sector

35,472 Posts.

2863

17/10/19

12:27

Post #: 40929389
Share

Originally posted by lispingduck: ↑

Here you go, an actual example of your ‘rule of 70’ at work.

”Rule of 70 Versus Real Growth It's important to remember that the rule of 70 is an estimate based on forecasted growth rates. If the rates of growth fluctuate, the original calculation may prove inaccurate. The population of the United States was estimated at 161 million in 1953, approximately doubling to 321 million in 2015. In 1953, the growth rate was listed as 1.66%. By the rule of 70, the population would have doubled by 1995. However, changes to the growth rate lowered the average rate, making the rule of 70 calculation inaccurate.”

Expand

Lol, why is it so hard Duck.
The rule of 70 does not change. OBVIOUSLY

so do you think Australia can grow at 1% average over next 70 years?

you think, maybe, maybe not and maybe again...LOL

Last edited by Sector: 17/10/19
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

LU7

Lithium Universe targets silver boom with breakthrough solar recycling tech

ASX Market Close: Why are we red today? Because US CPI's at 3%

LIS

Li-S Energy the latest microcap to pivot to US defence market

LDX

Lumos Diagnostics surges 140% on major US contract deal

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 018 – Potatoes, TACOs, and the $120M helicopter heist

First 35 Last

SPONSORED BY