Give us the link, no one wants your interpretation.
Answer this, if the law is so cut and dry them why did the high court extinguished the covenant?
If the covenant is so iron clad then why is there a law to abolish them?
So? Yes or no?
Let me remind you what your stance is on the entire thing.
Despite the fact that:
No sane person would interpret the law like what you did.
Why are you refusing to debate on the logic I have given you, that pertains to why it is unlikely that Synlait Pokeno is going to be affected?
Ann: SML Announcement - Supreme Court Update, page-254
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 257 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
