Honestly, you really need to get a better handle on what ISX does. You were getting flamed because your understanding of the KAB and ISX relationship was poor. And once again you have demonstrated it with this post.
You really need to stop posting about things you have absolutely no idea about.
You state:
"Question 12: Questioning again the timing of the sudden revenue burst for performance shares declaring all problems solved and then the next quarter claiming the problems were suppressing revenue. Most interesting, the KAB issues caused revenue suppression. Obviously KAB was doing more than just holding a few bucks for ISX. KAB was processing, somehow, revenue transactions for ISX even though ISX provided no services to KAB. This question also probes if ISX has been properly open about the KAB issues, their timing and impact on ISX."The bold part is where you make a crucial fundamental error and then use it make a factually inaccurate allegation about ISX.
Fact 1. ISX cannot hold money on behalf of a client directly, in it's own bank accounts. In the European region, they needed a bank to do that.
Fact 2. For ISX to process a transaction they need to nominate a custodian to hold clients funds (A bank)
Fact 3. If ISX need to process transactions on behalf of a European client, the funds would have to be held in that account (KAB).
Fact 4. Holding clients funds in a bank account (KAB) does not constitute a service for KAB, and it doesn't not constitute KAB providing a service to ISX's clients. It simply a deposit as a custodian. So once again, your assertions are way off the mark, you don't understand the service ISX provides or it's relationship with KAB, at any level, other than what you want to see.
There are numerous other issues with your post, but I don't have time to educate you on everything. Hopefully everyone can see just how little you actually know on these issues.
