Hope 2008,
Looked at CER. Whilst I know it is safer it still carries downside if things go wrong, whereas CNP carries huge leverage on the upside. I like to invest where the upsides can be multiples, i.e. higher percentage returns.
Easy to say CER carries less risk than CNP, but it is really all dependent on CNP. I would hate to be a CER holder if CNP failed, so it all comes back to CNP in the long run. Why take less upside when there is still a great deal of risk attached to parent entity.
Regards
Buffett
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CNP
- buffett hits 3 million
buffett hits 3 million, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)