Share
19,072 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2666
clock Created with Sketch.
03/11/19
17:35
Share
Originally posted by nickyjames:
↑
semantics! He basically contradicted the BS you were posting. He was a first hand witness to the call and was the "star" witness that the media said would conform everything. Not only did he not confirm the rubbish post that you were trying to push, he actually contradicted what you are trying to portray. And that is that this first hand witness to the call thinks that the transcript is accurate and that there was not with illegalities of the call. I wouldn't be suprised that this first hand witness comes as a total shock to you. The media played his testimony up as being devastating for Trump, when in actual fact, the media didn't focus on those two main points but instead bypassed those facts and sensationalised the fact that he was concerned that the call would be politicised. Do some reading!
Expand
Even if you guys want to rubbish all the witness testimonies. You can't walk away from White House's own transcript and Mick Mulvaney's own press conference: he confirmed outright the President committed a High Crime, using his public office and he told the public to get over it.