re barnes naysayers, page-7

I thought forging someone signature over 100 times which was one of the 15 reasons the appeal was won is significant, but then it was someone on the your side that did that. it appears the ethics of this group has not changed. as usual anyone that gets between this mob and reality is to be lied about misquoted etc ,quite frankly would not have expected any different.
again as in the past have tried to get GGG to go forward it has not and appears to be retreating. my question to nro and others who benefit from this golden goose called GGG is why does this company need to get a licence at all when everyone is getting paid so well. surely with a licence and then having to build a mine the dynamics of who gets to control the nest egg will change.
again I see no urgent action to wards a licence and in fact the last EIA can only be described as a disgrace.
nro and friends if you have to go back a decade to try to change the subject it just shows how much you are trying to keep the status quo of no action or should I say no( but expensive) action.

it is unbelievable with the major new discoveries in this intrusion that GGG has not bothered to do any work on these new finds and in fact has done no work geologically in the field since 2011.. that is another question nro you should be asking GGG, sure you may be a paid PR man or a stockbroker etc but that should not stop you asking vital questions of this company to try and get this company going forward