"Here you go, read, listen and learn."Thanks RedP.
I learned that Ross Garnaut has written yet another book explaining how his Economic and Academic expertise will solve all the problems of Society and we should all buy at least 1 copy to make sure this happens.
Mr Garnaut is rightfully considered "eminent" and "expert" in his field of Economics and "Policy Development" ... whatever that means.
I have no problem if you are reassured by his theoretical musings but I prefer real world suggestions and solutions put forward by those engineers, evil investors and self preservation politicians that actually deal with how things are ... not how they should be.
@RedCedar 's solution is much more practical and I do like the marketing potential of a low emission Nuclear BBQ. Add the word "breeder" and it's a no brainer for overnight success.
Off topic, I can't think of a single thing that all the Economists in the World have ever contributed to Human advancement or welfare.
They seem fixated with demanding that the concept and practice of a "Society" is wrong and should be replaced by an "Economy".
Up the mighty dollar !
Mind you, I could be wrong so don't burn Ross's book just yet.
"Also why do you claim that population is the issue when we in the West produce many times CO2 of undeveloped countries?"This statement has me mystified because it's just not true. You were the one who in response to a post by DBT9 on the population issue, said it was a good reason to pursue renewables etc. I merely asked what was the connection between renewables and population growth.
Per capita ... irrelevant in the real world since Nature is not the slightest bit influenced by per capita graphs so beloved by those of high moral virtue.
Don't shoot the messenger. That's just how it is.
As for posting about "the real problem" ... what is it ?
Is it about all the sincere but damaged people whose childhood religious guilt trips and fear of "sin" are now being projected because of their need for punishment on Nature's normal business of adjustment and selection ?
.
.
