The way I see this argument, one side is saying "all of the evidence contradicts the FE view" while the other side is saying "I don't believe any of the evidence".
This is an untenable argument. It is like trying to convince an infant that sweets are bad for them. Impossible...they taste good and they go down so easily, so they must be good for you! Everything else is just a ploy by parents to deprive them of the lovely sugary goodness.
No opinion has finally laid his cards on the table in his last flurry of posts and made a defacto admission that this is not an argument about science (logic), but rather it is about religion (faith).
The honorable thing to do would be for him to desist from posting FE memes on the science forum, but we all know that religious people aren't renowned for being honorable.
