CPV Chart Thread, page-5922

Don't think you're getting the point.
It might be easy to suggest you buy the product at a price and then predict the debated return percentage.
That's elementary marketing.
However you haven't convinced me that what you are getting for that $1000 outlay is fair value as there are no costings.

In simpler terms as a builder, if I supply you with fantasy bricks that generate whatever at $100 a brick you would laugh me out the door.

For starters, if I buy $1000 of clear vue glass presumably it would be a certain size.
What would it cost me for the same size in current standard or double glazed glass.
Sorry to bring this down to simple arithmetic but it's important.

Until Clear Vue control their chain of supply this is scary because they really don't know what to charge and will be left at the behest of the appointed manufacturer who will have the option of supplying regular building glass or clear vue glass which incorporates a profit to the manufactuer.
Bit of blackmail in this. Hey it's a rough world.
So my crystal ball indicates that Clear Vue must be shopping the world trying to get indicative quotes from manufacturers and the numbers might not be working as expected.
And what do you think, when Clear Vue ask for a quote they are going to have to indicate their requirements of course mentioning their patents.
That's why I say they patents aren't tested in court and will be challenged.
Heard of China?

Over to you.