Ann: Notice of General Meeting/Proxy Form, page-83

@JB1975 satisfied now?

I did not mention it before, but your “ear candy” comment is insulting…… how do you expect or can demand an answer or cooperation?

Further to that, I have held suspicions for your great motivation in ‘analysing’ AVZ matters and on occasion you, in my opinion, sufficiently err in your attempts to aver a pessimistic view as nothing less than baiting to say the least……. For the basic reason that you invoke logic and rationality but in fact your postings are inflected with pretensions.

I’ll keep it short for now out of politeness to onlookers but for example:

Your “I think” in the post following here without a preceding thesis makes a claim about the reason for Dathcom’s change of legal status :

“I think the someone that cares enough to make it a condition is the beneficial owner of Dathomir.”

< https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/41769573/single >

The quote is one of the thoughts you’ve shared here of late that I call baiting because it’s actually what you accuse others of here……… “ear candy” ; to lure readers into intrigue and rumour mongering about AVZ being mired on the controlling grip of Kabila and the Chinese. It’s the kind of claim that reminds me of AVZ’s shadowy detractors that dare not show their face.

Someone who cares about their shares would try to substantiate the “ear candy” hypotheticals you employ to cast a shadow of doubt over the Manono project………… You are indeed smarter than most ‘simple stitch’ contrarians with transparent enough motives but in your case it’s laced with filibuster of an amateur rhetorician.

All IMO & DYOR