5 Bagger Thread. Fundamentals and Opinions, page-685

I'll just mail Them that..............


"Dear Siror Madame,

I’m asignificant Galena Shareholder since some Months.

BasicallyI think Abra is an Outstanding Peer Project, but it “also has (as All Othertoo) it “Pro’s and Con’s” “.

My Entryis “32c” (aussie), and I’m not following “any Rocket Phantasies” here.

Regardingthe Pro’s “and” Con’s just 2 Questions:

1) The33% Inferred Incorporation in Feasibility Study is still a little risky,right??

The behonest: I haven’t even believed that it’s ALLOWED incorporating “Inferred”Resources in DEFINITIVE/BANKABLE Feasibility Study!

NoOffense, but I’m really, really wondered, to say the Least!

Question2)

Thisis a somewhat Continuation of Question 1.

The68% Incorporated Indicated Resources, after “applying All modifying Factors”.

I’m notsure about that: Is it STILL possible the Mineable “Indicated” resources willSTILL get bigger, “growth, from the 68%”?

(“basically”I would say: Yes. But I don’t know the “Factors”.)

2.2.

If seeingon a LONG term View:

I’m notspeaking about ANYthing binding Statements,

but doyou see it as PROBABLE the Mineable Resources from the “Inferred” Part will beat SOME Time later “significantly higher than the 33%”?

In theOne Edge you see a Reduction in Inferred Resources as “probably”, as What Iread.

As said,Nothing “Binding” Statements needed, but do you have some Sentences about it?

2) TheConcentrate Premiums: Can you give “any Indications how they “may will looklike” “??

As thatyou will get them, “ “Some” kind of Premium”, should be very, very, veryprobable, “nearly sure”, isn’t it?

3) MayOne Last Question:

YourFINAL Target, with Abra:

Is this“some Kind of Take Over”, or Whatever?

Or do youstill want to “run the Show Alone”, mine Abra “til the End of it’s Days”, orso?

GoodLuck with Galena!

XXX, from Germany.

(andexcuse in Advance, if English should be “Sometimes a little rumpy”)

"