Schiff caught out Lying again, page-133

@Glug

"Try doing some research on Robinson, everything was discussed on HC at the time, read the judgement where the judge discusses Robinson's admission of guilt"

I'd suggest I've probably done 10 times the research on the cases based on what you've written. He pleaded guilty under duress in a flawed trial in Leeds. That case was dismissed on appeal. He did not plead guilty in the London trial, however in sentencing him in London, they took into account the original guilty plea in the dismissed case in Leeds. You can't be that blind not to see this. Again, who would plead guilty and then tell a sitting president he needed asylum as an innocent man? "Try doing some research.." what a joke!

"Mueller is still in play, I gave you the link to the second installment, knock yourself out."

Mueller has had long enough, the report from earlier this year was built up so much and contained nothing. I knew it would be bad, but I didn't anticipate such a hilarious humiliation. What has since followed has been a non event. The Russian interference BS has been exposed for what it was. You sound as desperate as Clinton. Send whatever you like, but I won't "knock myself out" reading what Mueller's report says when the evidence suggests he himself does not know what his own reports are saying.

"As for your whistleblower comments, you start off with a red herring and follow up with the cry baby defense.

The whistleblower never claimed to have firsthand knowledge of the call, "

Why do you use phrases like "cry baby", are you lacking any intelligence? I never said the whistle blower claimed to have had first hand knowledge; I just said he didn't have first hand knowledge. The point I was making is that a second hand understanding of the phone call is really poor grounds for an accusation to be made, particularly when the other first hand witness is a foreign world leader who says there was no pressure applied at all.

"The whistleblower could be the biggest never Trump in the whole universe, it still does not negate what trump did."

What Trump did? The Democratic chairman said there was no quid quo pro and no threat of foreign aid withdrawal. The Ukraine president backs this up. The Director of National Intelligence said there was no case. The only people making this case are Democrats with a desire to see Trump thrown out of office for their own political gain. So "what Trump did" is absolutely nothing according to all the relevant witnesses.