Melbourne Roadshow, page-8

If FBR build machines and are paid by the joint venture partner (BKW paying for it not FBA) for the build of the machines how isn't this revenue? They have sold a product. This should be accepted and praised as another source of revenue outside laying bricks, I would prefer this than third parties putting them together and making the money.

Don't get me wrong I do understand it to be very questionable if FBR are to sell the machines to FBA and as part of that deal FBR contribute to paying for their own machines they built. I do not think this has been determined and people are quick to make judgement.

I suggest the first question is;

1. Will FBR and BKW under FBA pay for the machines or will the joint venture partner solely pay for the machines to be built?

If it is determined BKW will pay for the machines to be built and FBR provide the IP (This was suggested from the AGM) well put simply agree with me or not that is true revenue, money paid form one company to another. If the alternative is determined well then load up those cannons, fire each shot with precision and let the hard questions fly.

Just perhaps seek clarification in this first. A lot of emotions flying around here.