"The reality is you and your denier mates are living in La La land!"No, the reality is your version of "climate science" consists of slogans, alarmist rhetoric, sources and vested interests that write simplistic articles for the masses and Youtube videos. You can't even distinguish between actual source papers and sites which may cite excerpts for their own purposes. As previously mentioned to you, look at how many flat earth sites quote Einstein, Newton and other distinguished scientists in support of their claims. Does this mean those scientists are pseudoscience peddlers.
From all this you have constructed an exaggerated scenario which is no different from the Apocalyptic dire warnings of some religious fundamentalists. Civilizations rise and fall, cataclysms wipe out most life from time to time, climate changes dramatically and sometimes very quickly causing major disruption and destruction. That's just how it is. What evidence do you have that Mankind can change that ?
Like other alarmists you play the silly and transparent game of taking the most extreme views of so called "deniers" and then claim anyone who questions your view is no different from them.
Pathetic really. Nothing to do with science or research or sensible discussion.
BTW, show me where I have ever denied "climate science" or climate change or for that matter AGW. You don't seem able to understand that climate science is an active ongoing process with new insights gained every day.
There is increasing research that shows the role of Human CO2 emissions in climate change is not as straight forward as the GHG effect proposes. Such research will take time to present and be replicated and accepted. Expect to see much more of this in the next IPCC report.
Expect to see a significant change in the role of climate models and how their predictions are evaluated.
There is also the need to increase research on how trending climate changes will impact different regions and during different seasons.
For example, should Europe and North Eastern USA be preparing for longer and much more severe Winter freezes ... which is the trend, rather than milder Winters which is what was expected due to global warming ? Regardless of what the actual cause may be.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-02992-9Look how long it took the "Continental Drift" hypothesis to finally be accepted through the mechanism of plate tectonics theory.
Despite the obvious fact that continental shapes fitting each other was obvious for a very long time. It was accepted by geologists and other scientists as immutable that the continents were fixed. End of story. Eventually that claim was shown to be false.
No doubt the scientific consensus for a "fixed" Earth at the time Continental Drift was proposed would have been at least 97%.
In science, consensus is only one of the factors that contribute to probability, it certainly does not prove anything is certain.
All too subtle for you of course.
.
