Energy options, should Telstra be involved, page-255

You are right, but it's not hard to lay the seeds in the right places or the future, I do not think anyone would expect TLS to fund a national campaign to sway opinion.

It would be good to see some forward thinking and open minds. (Not just from TLS). .

I would imagine TLS will keep on the current path, I guess my posts for nuclear are aimed towards 10+ years and the module reactors TLS could install at exchanges. A new uranium mine has been approved in WA, which is a massive deposit.

a recent government commity has also recommended changes to lift the current moratorium on nuclear energy especially for new nuclear tech, particularly mentioned was modular nuclear tech. I can see appoint (I hope) that local battery and mini reactors work in tandem in the same area to maintain baseload and vary output to coinside with solar feed into the grid. The report recommended ANSTO to pretty much to oversee and review the tech and the implementation.

I've noticed also America are extending the expected life for a nuclear power station from 60 to 80 years, this, I assume would change the cost per dramatically.

alot of what I post is a longer term vision I would like to see TLS head. I am still in my 30s and plan for what my SMSF will benefit most from in 10 to 20 years time. All I can do is create an educated vision and keep an eye on the path the company takes to see if its heading in the right direction.

I just don't think selling business solar and wind is going to get TLS to were it could or needs to be.

I would like to add my original assessment had nothing to do with energy but it makes sense to were I see TLS needing to go and very much appreciate the input given here.



off topic, WA government is rolling out bluetooth receivers at every interesting in WA to ping, tract phones and the MAC address it provides. IoT of things is well and truly arriving.