Leaving myself open to bias retorts, but does our anyone think it strange that ReRAM does not warrant even a passing reference?
We express frustration at NDA constraints, but I wonder whether our original agreement with HGST, means there is certain information that WD is not officially entitled to know... and therefore share?
Otherwise, not even a throw away comment about ReRAM, in such a specific context, to me that is approaching disingenuous.
Not stooping to conspiracy theories, but this article does not provide the full story, for mine.
Views?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
