Pelosi's folly, page-98

Re "Evidence like the partial transcripts Trump released where Trump asked a foreign government for a personal favour."

Hang on, I thought you'd agreed that the "us" in the transcript as in "I would like you to do us a favour" was ambiguous. Room for doubt seemed to be the best you could summon up. Now you have it down as "evidence" that he was using "us" to mean a personal reference to himself.

Let's compare that verbal gymnastics to Biden definitely telling an audience that he had told the Ukrainian authorities he was not prepared to release aid to that nation unless a prosecutor was dismissed. This same prosecutor was eventually dismissed and we are told he has signed an affidavit stating he was dismissed because of his involvement in the Burisma investigation.

So which evidence do you like the most, the smoking gun of Biden (confident he will never get investigated) admitting he threatened aid withdrawal unless a prosecutor investigating his son is moved on, or a bit of linguistics shenanigans with a pronoun?