Pelosi's folly, page-113

  1. Osi
    16,127 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 201
    Hi Curious

    1. Our friends fail to register the fact that if Trump had any prima-facie evidence based case against Hillary he would have actioned it by now. There is nothing I can see on Mr Barr's table.

    2 The FBI is oversighted by Barr.

    3. Trump failed to do a 10 minute google before declaring Hunter to be unqualified and inexperienced. Should someone who can't manage a quick google or Bing search should he be POTUS? Where is the prima facie case? If there was one is Barr too incompetent to follow it up?

    4. Other than for the Cultists, who give a frigg about the Clintons? If there is evidence against anybody they can all be locked up if a jury believes them guilty. I don't care. The cultists are pissing into the wind on this one given that Trump has done Jack S&*^ on this one for THREE YEARS!

    BUGGOLD. If you POTUS would you have sat on the Hillary file and done nothing for 3 years beyond breaking wind on it? Yes or No?


    Last edited by Osi: 02/01/20
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.