Fires: poor management not climate., page-271

I do like that sentence “ People are limited by their scope of knowledge and a failure to understand what it is that they don’t know“!

Are scientists people?
Would a proper scientist claim that they have all the facts?
If they had all the facts why is MMCC and its effects on the Earth open to so much conjecture, why have we had so many outrageous claims (I don’t think anyone here needs to be reminded of some of the earlier calls that didn’t occur in the appropriate time frame) or why scientists continue to upgrade their computer models?

The need for clean power, clean water and less pollution is a given but CO2 as the one boogeyman and how the fight against it has been delivered is still suspect to say the least, IMO.
——
That’s an opinion, less than fully informed of course but who can say that they are fully informed about a theory?