Question for climate change proteters., page-120

  1. 58,171 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 664
    Didn't you read what I wrote Wang?

    Why do you call us "cultists"... this is an insult and suggests there is no evidence on which to base acceptance of the paradigm... Do you reject the large body of scientific evidence?

    I find it difficult to understand why people deny the science. In such rejection of hard evidence it is actually deniers who are "cultists" as they "believe", in blind faith, that the science and evidence is false.

    Can you please explain to me why you, who are an articulate and intelligent person, reject all the evidence that is freely available? Also why do some accept the absurd mis- dis-information that is promoted by heavily biased politicians? This goes against the acceptance of the need to transition away from coal and other GHG emitting investments by the likes of BHP and Woodside Petroleum.

    With respect, Scott
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.