Instead of funding a small army of climate scientists, I mean.
They seem to have reached this settled position (well, amongst themselves at least) and don’t seem to be progressing to the next stage, which is crunching the enormous amounts of data collected to predict what climate change means for our various population centres (ie real world implications).
So why keep funding large numbers of them?
That money could be better spend on applied science and engineering....ie the potential solutions to the problem.
It’s all about the allocation of scarce resources.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Why renewables can't save the planet.
Why renewables can't save the planet., page-149
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
FBM
FUTURE BATTERY MINERALS LIMITED
Nick Rathjen, MD & CEO
Nick Rathjen
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online